Here are my thoughts comparing both Enscape and Twinmotion 21 (I'm using it in Rhino 7): I think ( what I see ) can be a real rival for vray and Arnold in 3dsmax. Have you seen a flip from Twinmotion to unreal engine ? it can be the choice. This is not to say Twinmotion is any better, I haven't had the chance to use it yet, but definitely assess what your needs are for your work and workflow. But if you start to wander into realism, the shortfalls become glaringly clear in my opinion. It's been a godsend for my quick concepting projects, things that don't have to be super tight or accurate. This may seem like I ragged more on them for what I'm currently unhappy with than what I have been.
But on top of that, Enscape is raising their licensing costs and haven't touched or improved their lighting systems or interface since I started using it over a year and a half ago. This has been something that's always sort of irked me, but until recently I've been working in more conceptual space proposals vs realistic spaces. In order to acheive the effects that should be happening, you either have to overcompensate with luminous power of your light sources or fidget with the actual render settings (i.e. I'm getting into some more heavy lighting scenes requiring more realism and Enscape just doesn't seem to be anywhere close to par for generating a truly realistic lighting scheme.
Example: I have a rectangular light that is still casting an oval glow the same happens with line lights, as if there is a single light source in the center of the Enscape generated plane/line. They have the different light types, but they all produce VERY similar results. The biggest reason is I'm starting to realize how maddening the Enscape lighting systems are. I'm finding myself seriously considering learning more about Twinmotion. Also, I've found Enscape to be relatively easy to learn and use too.
I do know Twinmotion has some interesting timelapse for vegetation growth, life stages of plants, etc. They've been expanding it though, and adding more vegetation, but unclear to what level of depth, variety, etc. They have an okay asset library, though none of their assets are immediately editable. The speed and export possibilities are awesome. It's been great for quick mock renders for solid quality renders, but don't expect anything close to VRAY or 3DSMax. I'm an interiors/interior architecture designer and have only had experience with Enscape.
0 kommentar(er)
